Do you experience any real difference between Rocky Mountains and Okanagans?
I burned two tons of Okanagans this year and really liked them - - - good heat, reasonable ash, very consistent product, worth a few extra bucks. I've also tried and liked Rocky Mountains and they seemed very similar. The specs on the bags look almost the same although probably the measured comparisons on this forum show a small but consistent difference in favor of the Okanagans.
The New England Wood Pellets from Jaffrey, NH I'm using now are acceptable but seem to burn more quickly for the same temperature and to produce a bit more ash. So I'm thinking of moving to three tons Okies and one ton of Rockies, reluctantly stepping away from the more local NEWP.
I guess the question comes down to this: technical measurements aside, are both labels about the same? Practically speaking, do you feel much difference?
I burned two tons of Okanagans this year and really liked them - - - good heat, reasonable ash, very consistent product, worth a few extra bucks. I've also tried and liked Rocky Mountains and they seemed very similar. The specs on the bags look almost the same although probably the measured comparisons on this forum show a small but consistent difference in favor of the Okanagans.
The New England Wood Pellets from Jaffrey, NH I'm using now are acceptable but seem to burn more quickly for the same temperature and to produce a bit more ash. So I'm thinking of moving to three tons Okies and one ton of Rockies, reluctantly stepping away from the more local NEWP.
I guess the question comes down to this: technical measurements aside, are both labels about the same? Practically speaking, do you feel much difference?