Greetings, and Happy Holidays
Appreciate all the helpful information here. Have been reading, and wanted to check in on a stove and liner install.
Planning on a Woodstock Ideal Steel*, rear exit for installation in front of an existing fireplace (28.5" lintel so min leg height, no ash pan).
The main issue is we need a liner (he flue is clay lined but it looks to be 10" tile, ~20' above fireplace, but I still need to measure both precisely)
The kink, literally, is a 12" offset** 6 up the flue from the damper (2' to the top of the smoke chamber then a 4' slanted run to a bend where it continues straight up).
I understand there are schools of thought on what is best but where we need to install at least some flex I plan to install it end to end for continuity.
Given 6' to cover a 12" offset the angle required is seemingly fairly small. I'm not clear though on how much liner flex is required to cleanly negotiate that bend.
From reading, .006" seems to be generally regarded as reasonable, albeit while calling for gentle cleaning with a poly brush. From how it's rolled for delivery it would seem workable enough with a bit of push/pull persuasion, but with no direct experience this is my primary question for the good people of hearth.com...
Beyond that, from what I've read 'roll your own burrito' makes for a lighter package overall than pre-insulated. Is there any reason given the bend we should specifically avoid or prefer either that or pre-insulated?
I'm comfortable building and repairing stuff, but would also happily hire out getting the liner installed and the stove connected. Anyone in or can recommend someone that works in the midcoast Maine area?
Any related feedback is much appreciated.
Thanks in advance
** Notes and photos if you want to take a look/potentially check my work
Photos at https://photos.google.com/share/AF1...?key=Z3pMckpvY09QSmthZFNJTmxsVjFZMFpHaVhyRmd3
Interior stonework and exterior brickwork are both 72" wide.
Fireplace opening is centered in that with the top of the smoke chamber seemingly centered over the inner hearth, or perhaps just slightly offset toward the main flue side.
Dual-flue chimney is 32" wide and aligned with the inner edge of the lower stone/brickwork.
Assuming the flues are symmetrical, that's 16" each and 8" to the center of one flue.
Add 4" to get from 32" to the center of the hearth at 36" and that would seemingly make for a 12" offset.
Outer hearth is 22.5" deep, which we understand we need to extend and insulate to the spec in the manual, plus either shielding or replacing the mantel.
* To be honest we're partial to cast iron, but only so many stoves will fit. I'd be fine with the Progress Hybrid, wife not so much aesthetically, and where the stove is my idea and she's supporting it, simple and functionally excellent is beautiful... (and cheaper doesn't hurt)
I've seen people trying to coax Woodstock into wrapping an IS-like stove in cast iron, but no apparent references to any kind of plans. Should you happen to have any insight...
Appreciate all the helpful information here. Have been reading, and wanted to check in on a stove and liner install.
Planning on a Woodstock Ideal Steel*, rear exit for installation in front of an existing fireplace (28.5" lintel so min leg height, no ash pan).
The main issue is we need a liner (he flue is clay lined but it looks to be 10" tile, ~20' above fireplace, but I still need to measure both precisely)
The kink, literally, is a 12" offset** 6 up the flue from the damper (2' to the top of the smoke chamber then a 4' slanted run to a bend where it continues straight up).
I understand there are schools of thought on what is best but where we need to install at least some flex I plan to install it end to end for continuity.
Given 6' to cover a 12" offset the angle required is seemingly fairly small. I'm not clear though on how much liner flex is required to cleanly negotiate that bend.
From reading, .006" seems to be generally regarded as reasonable, albeit while calling for gentle cleaning with a poly brush. From how it's rolled for delivery it would seem workable enough with a bit of push/pull persuasion, but with no direct experience this is my primary question for the good people of hearth.com...
Beyond that, from what I've read 'roll your own burrito' makes for a lighter package overall than pre-insulated. Is there any reason given the bend we should specifically avoid or prefer either that or pre-insulated?
I'm comfortable building and repairing stuff, but would also happily hire out getting the liner installed and the stove connected. Anyone in or can recommend someone that works in the midcoast Maine area?
Any related feedback is much appreciated.
Thanks in advance
** Notes and photos if you want to take a look/potentially check my work
Photos at https://photos.google.com/share/AF1...?key=Z3pMckpvY09QSmthZFNJTmxsVjFZMFpHaVhyRmd3
Interior stonework and exterior brickwork are both 72" wide.
Fireplace opening is centered in that with the top of the smoke chamber seemingly centered over the inner hearth, or perhaps just slightly offset toward the main flue side.
Dual-flue chimney is 32" wide and aligned with the inner edge of the lower stone/brickwork.
Assuming the flues are symmetrical, that's 16" each and 8" to the center of one flue.
Add 4" to get from 32" to the center of the hearth at 36" and that would seemingly make for a 12" offset.
Outer hearth is 22.5" deep, which we understand we need to extend and insulate to the spec in the manual, plus either shielding or replacing the mantel.
* To be honest we're partial to cast iron, but only so many stoves will fit. I'd be fine with the Progress Hybrid, wife not so much aesthetically, and where the stove is my idea and she's supporting it, simple and functionally excellent is beautiful... (and cheaper doesn't hurt)
I've seen people trying to coax Woodstock into wrapping an IS-like stove in cast iron, but no apparent references to any kind of plans. Should you happen to have any insight...