Hi There!
New pellet stove owner here. Harman Accentra freestanding. Installed a few weeks ago by the shop I bought it from. Why did I choose a harman accentra? I really wanted a pellet stove, and my wife did not. She thought the big black boxes were ugly. We compromised by agreeing to get one if she had veto power on "ugly" models. She really liked the look of the Accetra (complete with optional legs), and it seemed like a quality stove from the research I did (although a bit pricey), so we went for it. We had it painted, and I have to say it looks quite sharp in our living room.
Now that I have it, there is no looking back and I want to get the best bang for my buck in terms of efficiency. I knew it was undersized from the time I first looked at it (40,000 btu in a 2400 square colonial style home). BUT, it's an extremely well insullated 4 year old house, and I planned all along on supplementing it with my traditional natural gas heat already in the house as needed.
Ok, that's the background, now to my question. For the past week or so temps during the day have been in the 50's, and high 20's to low 30's on the colder nights. At it's lowest setting (1 pound per hour), that little thing throws out (imo) some decent heat. At 2 pounds per hour, I guess it throws more heat, but it doesn't seem to be double the heat, even though I'm using twice as many pellets. Perhaps I'm wrong, heat output seems hard to "measure". My question is this. Should I be getting double the heat from burning double the pellets? Or would it make sense that I'm going to get a set amount of heat buring at 1 pound per hour, and more heat from burning 2 pounds, but not necessarily double? Is there a rate at which I'll get the best "bang for my buck" when it comes to pellets? Natural gas isn't cheap, but neither are pellets. Could it be that my best "bang for my buck" is at 1 pound per hour?
Thanks for taking the time to read all of this and respond. I would also welcome any additional tips you think this new stove owner could use.
Ron
New pellet stove owner here. Harman Accentra freestanding. Installed a few weeks ago by the shop I bought it from. Why did I choose a harman accentra? I really wanted a pellet stove, and my wife did not. She thought the big black boxes were ugly. We compromised by agreeing to get one if she had veto power on "ugly" models. She really liked the look of the Accetra (complete with optional legs), and it seemed like a quality stove from the research I did (although a bit pricey), so we went for it. We had it painted, and I have to say it looks quite sharp in our living room.
Now that I have it, there is no looking back and I want to get the best bang for my buck in terms of efficiency. I knew it was undersized from the time I first looked at it (40,000 btu in a 2400 square colonial style home). BUT, it's an extremely well insullated 4 year old house, and I planned all along on supplementing it with my traditional natural gas heat already in the house as needed.
Ok, that's the background, now to my question. For the past week or so temps during the day have been in the 50's, and high 20's to low 30's on the colder nights. At it's lowest setting (1 pound per hour), that little thing throws out (imo) some decent heat. At 2 pounds per hour, I guess it throws more heat, but it doesn't seem to be double the heat, even though I'm using twice as many pellets. Perhaps I'm wrong, heat output seems hard to "measure". My question is this. Should I be getting double the heat from burning double the pellets? Or would it make sense that I'm going to get a set amount of heat buring at 1 pound per hour, and more heat from burning 2 pounds, but not necessarily double? Is there a rate at which I'll get the best "bang for my buck" when it comes to pellets? Natural gas isn't cheap, but neither are pellets. Could it be that my best "bang for my buck" is at 1 pound per hour?
Thanks for taking the time to read all of this and respond. I would also welcome any additional tips you think this new stove owner could use.
Ron