Updating...
Okay, I had to update cause I never heard of R-Tech panels, and can't seem to find info on them. They do appear to at least be foam which, my post originally said you need foam hence, the update. Can you enlighten me about what R-Tech panels are, I'd like to know what they're made of (expanded or extruded polystyrene, or maybe polyisocyanurate) and how thick the foam?
Honestly, you should think about where you live. Fiberglass the bigger the temperature difference the worse its effective R-Value. Also, the more air movement in fiberglass the worse it acts, and just a 1% gap can have it lose 25-50% of it's R-Value. You live in a 14,000 Heating Degree area, that's even worse than the research base on top of Mt. Washington, even those living in Minnisota and Michigan which are at the top of the cold charts in the continental USA top off at a little over 8,000. I would not use fiberglass where you are, in the exact conditions it works at its worst.
Why not 2x4 walls with 4" of extruded polystyrene foam on the outside. You'll have a complete covering of foam, no short circuiting, and 4" of foam will insulate better than 30" of fiberglass where you live (that may be sarcastic but you get the point). You need to focus on foam board insulation, and having a choice of doing 4" of foam, or 2" of foam and R13 or R21 batts the 4" foam will insulate better. You can also overlap them preventing gaps, and any small spaces can be filled with expanding foam or caulked.
I have a heat loss analyses calculator that uses the heating degree days of where you live. Plugging in Fairbanks, Alaska if you build a house with 4" of XPS foam on the outside, and leave it at that you should go through 0.89 cords for every 1,000 sq ft of wall surface area/year (or to look at it another way 4" of foam will lose 16.8 million btu's/year per 1,000 sq ft). If your walls account for 1,000 sq ft that setup will only take less than a cord/year for your walls. Let's up it to 6" of foam, that reduces your heat loss to take only 0.59 cords/year to heat per 1,000 sq ft surface area (or 11.2 million btu's heat loss through walls/year). So, you have to figure out if paying for 2" more foam would be worth it, and again the above is for Fairbanks Alaska.
So, you want to minimize on what's called short circuiting and maximize the amount of foam board insulation & air sealing I'd opt for just 2x4 walls with 4" of foam insulation on the outside (or if you want put 6") and with the $ saved work on perhaps something that can cover the windows at night. With probably the $ saved you can make your own shutters out of excess foam board that you can close at night and add R10 to the windows that go against seals. Also, spend more on air sealing as even a pinhole leak in that house with that temperatue difference is going to cause a huge amount of heat loss. Otherwise I think a fiberglass outside wall, then an R-Tech wall between, then a regular open wall is a lot of wall and $ and I don't expect will be as good as just putting foam on the outside of a single wall and air sealing. The only problem I have, is that I'm not a fan of hollow walls period. Any leak in the bottom and top is like a tiny chimney that causes huge amounts of heat loss. I'd spray wet blown cellulose on the inside walls, all of them to minimizes air leaks/movement better, has better consistent R-Value, and adheres in place and not have hollow walls. It's not too difficult to do work with cellulose in the walls, electricians and plumbers have to work through it all the time. For air leaks, most important place to seal them is the attic, followed by the basement, followed by the main floor because of what's called the stack effect. For windows that you want to open, you may want to pay the extra for casements which are better at air sealing than double-hung (but cost more). Casements close on a thick rubber compression seals, double-hung use 1/8" bristles for air sealing that the windows slide up/down. Where you live, you don't want to depend on bristles IMHO.