We moved into a home last year that has a masonry wood burning fireplace with some issues (noted below, per multiple inspections that we had done). We have not done anything with it, and are now wanting to convert to a direct vent gas insert.
The companies who provided the inspections last year say that we still would need to make all or most of these fixes before putting in the insert. This doesn't make sense to me. I would expect that the top needs to be waterproofed either way, but why should I care about mortar gaps in the smoke chamber and lining if the by-products from the insert are removed out through their own vent?
Apparent issues identified by the inspections:
Smoke chamber: Stage 3 creosote; Gaps/missing mortar.
Fix: Respray with high heat ceramic mortar (smoketite or Chamber tech?)
Flue system: deteriorating/missing wythe joints;
Fix: new stainless steel liner
Profile joint and firebox: needs touchups
Exterior: Spauling? brick missing; missing/cracked mortar joints. Improper install of flashing
Fix: 3-stage waterproofing: resurface top portion with crownsaver (rubberized elastomeric coating) saturating entire stack with chimney saver water repellent, sealing flashing and all missing or cracked mortar joints.
This is one of the responses I got when I went back and asked about a direct vent alternative (he did recommend gas logs)
"I am not sure why you want a direct vent insert. It is not necessary, you still have to do all the other work, (smoktite, waterproofing, crown etc.) and install a liner."
Does reference to still needing a liner just refer to the co-linear fresh air/combustion tubes? Seems like that is way easier than the stainless liner needed to fix if keeping wood burning
I really appreciate you reading this and welcome any insight or recommendations you have.
The companies who provided the inspections last year say that we still would need to make all or most of these fixes before putting in the insert. This doesn't make sense to me. I would expect that the top needs to be waterproofed either way, but why should I care about mortar gaps in the smoke chamber and lining if the by-products from the insert are removed out through their own vent?
Apparent issues identified by the inspections:
Smoke chamber: Stage 3 creosote; Gaps/missing mortar.
Fix: Respray with high heat ceramic mortar (smoketite or Chamber tech?)
Flue system: deteriorating/missing wythe joints;
Fix: new stainless steel liner
Profile joint and firebox: needs touchups
Exterior: Spauling? brick missing; missing/cracked mortar joints. Improper install of flashing
Fix: 3-stage waterproofing: resurface top portion with crownsaver (rubberized elastomeric coating) saturating entire stack with chimney saver water repellent, sealing flashing and all missing or cracked mortar joints.
This is one of the responses I got when I went back and asked about a direct vent alternative (he did recommend gas logs)
"I am not sure why you want a direct vent insert. It is not necessary, you still have to do all the other work, (smoktite, waterproofing, crown etc.) and install a liner."
Does reference to still needing a liner just refer to the co-linear fresh air/combustion tubes? Seems like that is way easier than the stainless liner needed to fix if keeping wood burning
I really appreciate you reading this and welcome any insight or recommendations you have.