I am torn between the two above inserts.
I like the size of the Timberwolf more than the Quadrafire, but have some concerns with primary and secondary air on the Timberwolf (they are fixed) with a draft adjustment above the door. The Quadrafire has the ACC system, which is a good method of draft to start a fire.
The real issue is I have a Martin fireplace in the base level of a 2.5 story home. When I light the fireplace I have to open a door due to negative air. I am concerned the Timberwolf will have problems getting fires started, and I will have problems regulating draft.
I am convinced the Quadrafire is a good product, but it has a smaller firebox and would cost me more.
Anybody have any experience with the Napoleon Timberwolf?
Also, any problems with taking the refractory out of the existing fireplace when installing an insert?
I grew up with an Ashley wood stove so the new technology is perplexing.
Thanks,
Randy
I like the size of the Timberwolf more than the Quadrafire, but have some concerns with primary and secondary air on the Timberwolf (they are fixed) with a draft adjustment above the door. The Quadrafire has the ACC system, which is a good method of draft to start a fire.
The real issue is I have a Martin fireplace in the base level of a 2.5 story home. When I light the fireplace I have to open a door due to negative air. I am concerned the Timberwolf will have problems getting fires started, and I will have problems regulating draft.
I am convinced the Quadrafire is a good product, but it has a smaller firebox and would cost me more.
Anybody have any experience with the Napoleon Timberwolf?
Also, any problems with taking the refractory out of the existing fireplace when installing an insert?
I grew up with an Ashley wood stove so the new technology is perplexing.
Thanks,
Randy