I just had a chance to look at some of their list of new approved units and it appears to have been released without any review or fact checking. Data is missing and in some cases so erroneous as to be laughable.
How about these..........
Some models listed do not even show the average output for an 8 hour burn. (I thought this was part of the new standard!?!? )
Garn is listed as requiring storage . DOH!! Seriously?
One of Central Boilers models shows a lower peak output than the average over an 8 hour burn.... How does that work?
Some models listed as being tested with cordwood, never were.
Some of the emission levels listed just plain look bogus. I mean really off base.
All I'm saying people is don't use the EPA's hang tags and guidelines as any sort of an indicator for what performance you can expect. From the short scan I did, it would seem that whoever is supposedly reviewing and compiling the manufacturers data, is sound asleep at the wheel.
........They are probably off figuring out how to plug holes in earthen dams somewhere.....
It is really frustrating to see fictitious and erroneous data like this released. Just flat out unacceptable.
How about these..........
Some models listed do not even show the average output for an 8 hour burn. (I thought this was part of the new standard!?!? )
Garn is listed as requiring storage . DOH!! Seriously?
One of Central Boilers models shows a lower peak output than the average over an 8 hour burn.... How does that work?
Some models listed as being tested with cordwood, never were.
Some of the emission levels listed just plain look bogus. I mean really off base.
All I'm saying people is don't use the EPA's hang tags and guidelines as any sort of an indicator for what performance you can expect. From the short scan I did, it would seem that whoever is supposedly reviewing and compiling the manufacturers data, is sound asleep at the wheel.
........They are probably off figuring out how to plug holes in earthen dams somewhere.....
It is really frustrating to see fictitious and erroneous data like this released. Just flat out unacceptable.