Keep the Vermont Castings '77 Vigilant? Or Bring the Jotul Oslo?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

ontherise

Member
Hearth Supporter
Hey Everyone

It's moving time.. Selling our house we are in now. We put a Jotul Oslo in here at the old house a few years back. (though this year we let the poor thing stay cold - got busy and a bit lazy and we installed a Harman Ascendra insert and found it easier to bring bags in than wood in). We like the Oslo.. We like seeing the fire through the glass. We had a decent time burning it - though it was finicky to start, a bit sensitive to me typically being a little late on the firewood seasoning, and was sometimes a hassle to load the way we put it in where the side load door was...

At the new place there is an older 1977 Vermont Castings Vigilant parlor stove. They seem to be around the same looking size - but looking from the top down - it sure looks like I can put a fair amount more into the Vigilant because it doesn't have the baffles/etc at the top like the Oslo does. We fired the vigilant up today at the new house (Previous owners were in the house for 35 years and took amazing, detail oriented care of the old house and the equipment in it.. Stove is great, flue collar, chimney, stove attachments, and castings all look excellent) and it sure felt a lot easier. I didn't have a ton of kindling right handy. Sort of just opened the top, put some paper, some medium size wood the previous onwer had in the pile, some sticks/branches and then a couple wedges of wood in - lit it, opened the damper, opened the "side port" all the way, opened the back thermostat control all the way and let it do it's thing.. In short order I was having to quickly close a few of the things I opened as I learned to work the stove.. Stovetop temp got to 700 quickly, flue got to 400+ quickly. Felt like nice heat. My wife didn't like the lack of glass. I didn't mind it because it sure felt easier and seemed like she might go longer assuming I can chalk it full before bed.. Even ran it with the screen in a bit for the kids and they liked that.

Anyway.. I know they are different stoves. But if you had the choice - what would you do and why? There is another chimney in the house that doesn't have oil on it.. Currently operating a Gas fireplace insert - which I many want to rip out and put a pellet insert in (maybe bring the harman over).. Or maybe just put a wood stove in that room - but probably not, too small and not right shape.. No heat upstairs in this house, it's an older one before running baseboard or ductwork was a consideration - used to have wood stoves all over the place on the same chimneys in the upstairs and downstairs
 
I say run the Vigilant. I replaced my Defiant with an Oslo and absolutely miss the old stove. So much easier to use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ontherise
Like I've said, if you like burning lots and lots of wood bring the Oslo.
 
Like I've said, if you like burning lots and lots of wood bring the Oslo.

Well I think in this house, I'll probably need to burn lots and lots of wood :-) It was built in 1890, it's tight, but has a lot of nooks and crannies and the upstairs has no heat run to it at all and someday I may want to move the attic insulation to the roof instead of floor and use the attic (four kids, an office, etc) for office space and my wife's sewing/crafts/etc area. So I imagine I'll be doing the wood thing again - and maybe the pellet thing.

But tonight? It was about 18 up here and wind was howling. Firing up that Vigilant with just the couple small splits? Felt good. Missed that smell this season. Missed that radiating/soaking heat (Don't get me wrong the Pellet stove heat blowing on us has been great and may have done a better job than the Oslo in previous years) and that feeling of burning wood.

I'm leaning to keeping the Vigilant and letting the Oslo be a selling feature of this one. Now if I can just find some glass doors for the Vigilant.
 
Given the age of the house and another chimney available I would consider bringing the Oslo along and keeping the Vigilant. Just be sure that both chimneys are in good condition. If necessary, drop a stainless steel liner for the stove.
 
That old Vermont Castings is a great stove. Keep it!
 
If I had to choose ten different times I'd choose the Jotul every time. While the old (soon to be 40 years old) VC will likely put out more peak heat, the Jotul will get far more out of a given quantity of wood, i.e. better efficiency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: firefighterjake
VC will likely put out more peak heat, the Jotul will get far more out of a given quantity of wood, i.e. better efficiency.
Agreed. If I planned to do any serious heating, I would want something I could maybe get an overnight burn with. If you want to run the Vigilant clean, you are going to have to run it hot and you'll blow through tons of wood. If you want an overnight burn you are going to have to smolder it and smoke out the 'hood. If you have dry wood and good draft the Oslo should be pretty easy to run, not finicky, and give more heat with much less wood. What would be the setup for the Oslo...center of house, chimney height? Sounds like the Vig was drawing well, so I'm thinking chimney is pretty tall? Class A chimney through the roof? No glass is no-go for me; Besides not getting to see the pretty flame, runing a stove without being able to see the fire is like trying to drive with a blindfold on. ;hm
I would consider bringing the Oslo along and keeping the Vigilant.
Yep. You won't get your money out of the Oslo leaving it there; Better to bring it along for more flexibility and firepower, then figure out the final solution later.
 
Last edited:
Bring the Oslo with you . . . unless the seller specifically mentions it in the purchase agreement.

As Woody said it is doubtful that it will recoup the cost . . . heck, some folks (believe it or not) don't even like heating with wood.

Bringing the Oslo with you will give you flexibility -- burn the VC as long as you like it and it works . . . or switch out to the Oslo. Personally, I kinda like watching the flames . . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.