Hi -
I recently bought a house that came with a very nice little Jotul F100 stove installed in the old brick fireplace. It's placed pretty far forward on the outer hearth such that the door is just 2" back from the front edge of the wood floor, necessitating a hearth pad extension. Wondering if there is any reason not to move the stove back into the inner hearth and replace the rear flue exit with a top flue exit. The chimney liner is currently 16" behind the stove, such that if the stove was pushed back into the fireplace its top flue exit would line up with the chimney liner to give the required 18" of hearth clearance needed in front.
I've read online folks saying on one hand that a stove with top flue is more efficient than one with the rear flue, but on the other hand pushing the stove back into the fireplace would disrupt air flow and stop heat from spreading around the room. If possible, I'd like to move the stove far enough back that I don't need to use the hearth pad.
Appreciate any perspectives here!
I recently bought a house that came with a very nice little Jotul F100 stove installed in the old brick fireplace. It's placed pretty far forward on the outer hearth such that the door is just 2" back from the front edge of the wood floor, necessitating a hearth pad extension. Wondering if there is any reason not to move the stove back into the inner hearth and replace the rear flue exit with a top flue exit. The chimney liner is currently 16" behind the stove, such that if the stove was pushed back into the fireplace its top flue exit would line up with the chimney liner to give the required 18" of hearth clearance needed in front.
I've read online folks saying on one hand that a stove with top flue is more efficient than one with the rear flue, but on the other hand pushing the stove back into the fireplace would disrupt air flow and stop heat from spreading around the room. If possible, I'd like to move the stove far enough back that I don't need to use the hearth pad.
Appreciate any perspectives here!