UncleRich said:
elkimmeg said:
would you believe that most of the recycled metal is from old brakes parts Calipers drumbs ect. What you don't see is the remarkable job done for personal safety and every efort to recycle
Even the water used in the enamaling processed is recycled
We have a major recycler out here that makes trusses and mostly crusher balls. The metal is good down the line, so why can't we take advantage of the down slope, versus shipping it to China?
Several big reasons, all of which contribute to the problem
1. We invented alot of the technology, and built our plants using the first generation technology that was used as the basis for building later improved equipment, facilities, technology, skills, etc. This old technology formed a sort of technological "lock-in" because it couldn't compete with the more modern stuff, but it was to expensive to walk away from existing plant and start over. The overseas competitors built next generation plant from scratch, and were able to operate more efficiently because they weren't propping up all the older infrastructure.
2. Arguably excessive gov't regulation on where plants were built, how they operated, what they were allowed to have for emissions, etc., etc, ad nauseum, made it uninviting to attempt to build in the US when it was possible to build overseas with far less hassles. (look also to all the neighbor's screaming "NIMBY", then complaining about how the job market has gone to crap...) Regulations have costs, both the obvious physical cost of compliance and the less obvious costs of record keeping and other expenses of documenting the compliance. Reducing that regulatory compliance cost is a big incentive for companies to go elsewhere.
3. Labor unions, coupled with government regulations that give the Unions an unfair advantage in negotiations run up the cost of labor to the point where it is prohibitive to operate where unionizing is a business risk.
4. In some cases, the foreign technology is better than what is available in the US. I remember a few years back, there was a big flap when Harley Davidson bought several million $ worth of CAD/CAM hardware from Japan. Harley's response was most interesting, they claimed that they had developed their technical requirments, and looked for a U.S. source. They were willing to pay up to 25% MORE to get a US source, but went to Japan when they found that there was NO US source that could meet their needs at ANY price!
When businesses find it less expensive to ship their raw materials to a foreign country, get stuff made, and ship it back to the US, we shouldn't blame them for doing this, but instead should be asking why is it possible and what can be done to fix it.
Gooserider