I have done a lot of reading regarding stove reviews but im having trouble understanding how to rank one stove vs the other.
Here are the 3 that im considering based on dealer availability etc.
So im an engineer by trade and don't understand these numbers. How can a 3.65 cu/ft firebox with a 70hhv provide lower max btu than a 80HHV 2.5 cu/ft firebox.
So for instance if you took 1000 BTU x 80% x 2.5 vs 1000 BTU x 70% x 3.65 you come out quite a bit ahead on the 3.65cu/ft firebox.
Is my math bad or do i misunderstand? How can i best compare these?
For reference i have a 2000 sq foot area and live in Divide Colorado. We dont want to go on the light side of heat but really like the Lopi Liberty look and quality but not sure its enough heat.
Thank you,
Chris
Here are the 3 that im considering based on dealer availability etc.
MFGR | Model | Max Log length | Heating space | Max Output (BTU/HR) | Efficiency | Firebox size (CU FT) | Flue Size |
Kuma | Wood Classic LE | 18" | 2400 - 3000 | 82000 | 79.4 HHV | 2.5 | 6" |
Regency | F3500 | 20" | 1500 - 2500 | 88000 | 76 HHV | 3 | 6" |
Lopi | Endeavor II NexGen-Hybrid | 19.5 | 2000 | 70,500 | 80 hhv | 2.5 | 6" |
Lopi | NexGen Liberty | 24" | 2500 | 63239 | 70 HHV | 3.65 | 6 |
So for instance if you took 1000 BTU x 80% x 2.5 vs 1000 BTU x 70% x 3.65 you come out quite a bit ahead on the 3.65cu/ft firebox.
Is my math bad or do i misunderstand? How can i best compare these?
For reference i have a 2000 sq foot area and live in Divide Colorado. We dont want to go on the light side of heat but really like the Lopi Liberty look and quality but not sure its enough heat.
Thank you,
Chris