Agreed, on all points, in theory. But I do wonder if cleaning behind the bricks has a positive, if any, effect on corrosion. Keeping the stove dry is key, and while ash can hold or react with moisture, I do wonder if you'll ever get the stove truly clean enough to eliminate this factor. I wouldn't be completely surprised if cleaning the stove might actually accelerate corrosion, by eliminating a potential desiccant layer that is the ash bed, as there's always going to be enough remaining after any cleaning to hold some moisture against the metal.I want to look behind the firebricks to see what is going on. Any rust, any corrosion. I want to know what is happening with my stove. I do not want a 'surprise' someday when I don't need it. As I mentioned before, I believe ash is corrosive. I want to know what has happened during the heating season. I also do not want to leave the corrosive ash there during the non-heating humid season.
I have never had any problems removing bricks. For me it is easy to remove and replace them without damage.
But.....To each his own.
Funny to hear I'm not the only one who uses the "walnut tree barometer". I was just looking at mine today, and about half of them have small leaflets, the other half are still dormant.Predictions of 30's next few nights so I'll be burning. Too early to clean the walnuts haven't leafed out yet.
Most people don't pay any attention to the world around them. Every year the produce stand sells plants early so people can plant them, have frost kill them, and they can come back and buy more plants. Every year we have 3 or 4 returns of cold temps yet every year people are caught off guard.Funny to hear I'm not the only one who uses the "walnut tree barometer". I was just looking at mine today, and about half of them have small leaflets, the other half are still dormant.
Interesting. So a build-up of ash might be good. I don't know.Agreed, on all points, in theory. But I do wonder if cleaning behind the bricks has a positive, if any, effect on corrosion. Keeping the stove dry is key, and while ash can hold or react with moisture, I do wonder if you'll ever get the stove truly clean enough to eliminate this factor. I wouldn't be completely surprised if cleaning the stove might actually accelerate corrosion, by eliminating a potential desiccant layer that is the ash bed, as there's always going to be enough remaining after any cleaning to hold some moisture against the metal.
Overall, it probably doesn't matter much, if you're managing to keep things dry. My stoves are 7 years old now, and the prior stoves they replaced were 30 years old. None ever showed any appreciable corrosion, no matter how they were treated, their service life ended due to other issues.
Maybe. I was more implying that even a "cleaned" stove isn't all that clean. So, if there's compounds in the ash that promote corrosion, and that's going to be left behind on the metal whether you clean the thing or not, then maybe there's no benefit.Interesting. So a build-up of ash might be good. I don't know.
Probably not but not a bad idea to check itDo I need to get my flue pipes cleaned out?
I only had the Stove installed in Feb, lit maybe 20 fires or so.
I removed the bricks on my four year old Regency this spring, for the first time, just to look. I was shocked how much creosote was behind the back bricks, where the stove is the coldest. It resulted in a large rust area. I’m pretty anal about keeping my stove clean, but never really thought about it hiding back there. I suppose it contained moisture and since it was sitting there for years it created the surface rust. The rust was gone after the first fire after I cleaned it all out (or covered w soot so it’s not visible). I’ve attached a pic of the area. So I’m definitely now a fan of removing the bricks and cleaning behind them.Agreed, on all points, in theory. But I do wonder if cleaning behind the bricks has a positive, if any, effect on corrosion. Keeping the stove dry is key, and while ash can hold or react with moisture, I do wonder if you'll ever get the stove truly clean enough to eliminate this factor. I wouldn't be completely surprised if cleaning the stove might actually accelerate corrosion, by eliminating a potential desiccant layer that is the ash bed, as there's always going to be enough remaining after any cleaning to hold some moisture against the metal.
Overall, it probably doesn't matter much, if you're managing to keep things dry. My stoves are 7 years old now, and the prior stoves they replaced were 30 years old. None ever showed any appreciable corrosion, no matter how they were treated, their service life ended due to other issues.
This is the reason I take the bricks outI removed the bricks on my four year old Regency this spring, for the first time, just to look. I was shocked how much creosote was behind the back bricks, where the stove is the coldest. It resulted in a large rust area. I’m pretty anal about keeping my stove clean, but never really thought about it hiding back there. I suppose it contained moisture and since it was sitting there for years it created the surface rust. The rust was gone after the first fire after I cleaned it all out (or covered w soot so it’s not visible). I’ve attached a pic of the area. So I’m definitely now a fan of removing the bricks and cleaning behind them.
View attachment 312943
Why does that matter though? That's pretty much how every stove looks behind the bricks and it never causes a problemI removed the bricks on my four year old Regency this spring, for the first time, just to look. I was shocked how much creosote was behind the back bricks, where the stove is the coldest. It resulted in a large rust area. I’m pretty anal about keeping my stove clean, but never really thought about it hiding back there. I suppose it contained moisture and since it was sitting there for years it created the surface rust. The rust was gone after the first fire after I cleaned it all out (or covered w soot so it’s not visible). I’ve attached a pic of the area. So I’m definitely now a fan of removing the bricks and cleaning behind them.
View attachment 312943
That’s good to know. I’m glad to hear that. I guess for me it’s just an OCD thing. And it gives me a chance to really inspect everything. It puts my mind at ease I guess. But it makes me feel a lot better knowing it’s normal to see that surface rust behind the bricks. There’s a small amount behind my side wall bricks too. Nothing like this shown in the photo though. I’ve put a moisture absorber in the stove this off-seasonWhy does that matter though? That's pretty much how every stove looks behind the bricks and it never causes a problem
So the rust doesn’t hurt anything?Why does that matter though? That's pretty much how every stove looks behind the bricks and it never causes a problem
That small amount of surface rust? Absolutely notSo the rust doesn’t hurt anything?
My point, exactly. I was arguing that 2" of ash laying in there might actually act as a desicant layer, possibly preventing this. By being anal and cleaning it out, you've ensured the only hydrophyllic corrosive element remaining in your stove is the thin layer of ash and creosote remaining between the brick and the metal. You might have done better to just let it sit full of ash all summer.I removed the bricks on my four year old Regency this spring, for the first time, just to look. I was shocked how much creosote was behind the back bricks, where the stove is the coldest. ... I’m pretty anal about keeping my stove clean...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.