Hi you all,
I'm hoping to get some input from folks who are familiar with the F45 and T5, especially from the last few years. I know BeGreen has made positive comments on both, but edges towards the Alderlea line.
I'm under a short deadline due to a stove replacement voucher, so I'm having to make decisions more uninformed than I'd like. Clearance issues, heating needs, and spousal preferences (slight preference toward T5 as it's pictured in catalog) have narrowed me down to the F45 and the Alderlea T5. They will both fit my burning styles, I believe. Unfortunately, there's no T5 anywhere near for me to see it in person. I can see a Super 27, F55, and an old F45 in person at the local dealer.
Looking at the Jotul 2018 paper catalog, it places the F45 at a 2.3 cubic foot firebox vs. 2.1 for the T5. Functionally similar, I figure. The window is bigger on the T5 which is a plus. The catalog also lists the F45 at 445 pounds (their website says 400 - go figure) and the T5 at 515 pounds, which makes me wonder if there's more cast iron with the T5 or a better firebox. The Jotul prices at $2100 vs $2800 for the T5, but dollar averaging over a couple of decades, that's negligible. Those are the stats I have to go off, but nothing beats experience or seeing the real thing.
So, after that brief rambling here are some of the questions floating through my mind:
Is the quality of fit and finish about the same? I have an uninformed bias thinking that Scandinavian-based (Maine designed) Jotul F45 would have an advantage here.
Durability differences if treated properly?
Is the T5 door handle any good? It's looks a bit cheesy compared to the Jotul.
Warranty: Pacific Energy is "limited" lifetime and states only 10 years. (That doesn't sound like lifetime to me - I hope! ) Jotul has a true lifetime on baffold & manifold and 5 years on other parts. I guess any manufacturer defect should show up in 5-10 years and beyond that would be normal wear or my mistakes.
Which one would be easier to maintain / chimney sweep, if any difference at all?
The T5 lists smaller clearances, and I'm not sure if that's just company style or if it suggests something important about stove construction.
I wish I could just kick the tires in person....
(Oh, one last side comment. Once I get a stove and try it for a season, I'll post a review. I see so many people asking for help, then saying they've ordered a stove, give their thanks, good-bye, so long. But then they don't later post a stove review. For some models, there just aren't very many recent reviews, but I suspect there's been many purchases. )
Thanks for any and all input.
I'm hoping to get some input from folks who are familiar with the F45 and T5, especially from the last few years. I know BeGreen has made positive comments on both, but edges towards the Alderlea line.
I'm under a short deadline due to a stove replacement voucher, so I'm having to make decisions more uninformed than I'd like. Clearance issues, heating needs, and spousal preferences (slight preference toward T5 as it's pictured in catalog) have narrowed me down to the F45 and the Alderlea T5. They will both fit my burning styles, I believe. Unfortunately, there's no T5 anywhere near for me to see it in person. I can see a Super 27, F55, and an old F45 in person at the local dealer.
Looking at the Jotul 2018 paper catalog, it places the F45 at a 2.3 cubic foot firebox vs. 2.1 for the T5. Functionally similar, I figure. The window is bigger on the T5 which is a plus. The catalog also lists the F45 at 445 pounds (their website says 400 - go figure) and the T5 at 515 pounds, which makes me wonder if there's more cast iron with the T5 or a better firebox. The Jotul prices at $2100 vs $2800 for the T5, but dollar averaging over a couple of decades, that's negligible. Those are the stats I have to go off, but nothing beats experience or seeing the real thing.
So, after that brief rambling here are some of the questions floating through my mind:
Is the quality of fit and finish about the same? I have an uninformed bias thinking that Scandinavian-based (Maine designed) Jotul F45 would have an advantage here.
Durability differences if treated properly?
Is the T5 door handle any good? It's looks a bit cheesy compared to the Jotul.
Warranty: Pacific Energy is "limited" lifetime and states only 10 years. (That doesn't sound like lifetime to me - I hope! ) Jotul has a true lifetime on baffold & manifold and 5 years on other parts. I guess any manufacturer defect should show up in 5-10 years and beyond that would be normal wear or my mistakes.
Which one would be easier to maintain / chimney sweep, if any difference at all?
The T5 lists smaller clearances, and I'm not sure if that's just company style or if it suggests something important about stove construction.
I wish I could just kick the tires in person....
(Oh, one last side comment. Once I get a stove and try it for a season, I'll post a review. I see so many people asking for help, then saying they've ordered a stove, give their thanks, good-bye, so long. But then they don't later post a stove review. For some models, there just aren't very many recent reviews, but I suspect there's been many purchases. )
Thanks for any and all input.
Last edited: