Newbie PIPER complained recently that:
"But the ratings page on this website did not have too much nice to say about the Montpelier or the Clydesdale ." and BeGreen replied:
"I see 3 ratings of the Clydesdale in the review section, all are positive, which I would say also reflects the general response on this insert. It’s a good unit."
There are only 3 ratings and these ratings are for the older model 8490.
During my research for a wood insert these ratings did not make up for negative reviews on the “gardenweb.com†site.
http://ths.gardenweb.com/forums/load/firepl/msg0808455330428.html?5
http://www.thathomesite.com/forums/load/firepl/msg090544268380.html?2.
I am guessing that there are about fifty Clydesdale burners on this forum, but for some reasons we are reluctant to rate the Clydesdale. I just added my rating – the first one for new model 8491. (https://www.hearth.com/ratings/search.php)
Have a Happy, Healthy New Year and a Happy Burning!
"But the ratings page on this website did not have too much nice to say about the Montpelier or the Clydesdale ." and BeGreen replied:
"I see 3 ratings of the Clydesdale in the review section, all are positive, which I would say also reflects the general response on this insert. It’s a good unit."
There are only 3 ratings and these ratings are for the older model 8490.
During my research for a wood insert these ratings did not make up for negative reviews on the “gardenweb.com†site.
http://ths.gardenweb.com/forums/load/firepl/msg0808455330428.html?5
http://www.thathomesite.com/forums/load/firepl/msg090544268380.html?2.
I am guessing that there are about fifty Clydesdale burners on this forum, but for some reasons we are reluctant to rate the Clydesdale. I just added my rating – the first one for new model 8491. (https://www.hearth.com/ratings/search.php)
Have a Happy, Healthy New Year and a Happy Burning!