hi all, hope someone can help a dumb homeowner
I have had outdoor econoburn 150 (no storage) for 3000sqft, 20yo well insulated home with hot water baseboard (not low temp emitter) and my DHW is indirect hot water heater, my primary heat is an oil boiler which is fine, and I have been able to get by with only using it in the summer or when the wood boiler goes cold, and that has worked perfectly. I'm at 10-11 yrs with the econoburn and I think I might have to replace it. Its had some hiccups thru the years but otherwise it worked fine until recently. I wont get into whats wrong but am more interested in thinking about next season. My wood is free and high grade, well seasoned hardwood, in a 10 cord shed. this forum taught me everything about firewood and I do it pretty well.
option 1 is the simplest/cheapest, replace with same unit, if, and I mean IF I can get 10-15yrs or so out of a new econoburn 150 unit then that might be enough for me. (not doing this forever) I have a few big problems with that first option but I'd still consider it if the next option(s) are not feasible.
option 2 garn jr, always appealed to me because of integrated storage, except for the high temp water that I (think?) I need for my house. I'm home alot during the winter and can babysit a boiler if needed. Not that I want to but if it means I have greater long term durability/reliability then I'm still interested. With the batch burns it sounds like I'd need to start more fires to keep storage temp high, is that correct? I'm trying imagine what that would mean? new fires from scratch every 4 hrs? 8hrs? I'm also not clear if my existing pex (uponor ecoflex) is the proper size. I think mine is 1 inch, 1 supply, 1 return, and cannot be replaced (runs under a pool) so thats a deal breaker. Its also unpressurized, might need a HX?, and I'd need to build a shed for it but thats doable. Lastly I am not changing out any baseboards for low temp emitters, that's also deal breaker. So is garn jr realistic?
option 3 another outdoor gasser, years ago I considered portage main but I believe they are unpressurized, which I think means glycol and a HX? Maybe not a deal breaker because I could probably just use my existing foot print and add the HX somewhere inside...is that correct? Or maybe other brands? I use a competent hvac guy for the work, which is expensive around here, and try and diy when I can, but will never reach the engineer level that many on this forum are capable of. I am primarily interested in the return on investment, and enjoy the process of harvesting my own wood.
except for the garn I don't think I'm interested in cobbling together storage for any other gasser, I know its more efficient but if it faces the same hot water emitter issue as the garn then it seems moot...is that correct?
Thank you
signed
dumb homeowner
I have had outdoor econoburn 150 (no storage) for 3000sqft, 20yo well insulated home with hot water baseboard (not low temp emitter) and my DHW is indirect hot water heater, my primary heat is an oil boiler which is fine, and I have been able to get by with only using it in the summer or when the wood boiler goes cold, and that has worked perfectly. I'm at 10-11 yrs with the econoburn and I think I might have to replace it. Its had some hiccups thru the years but otherwise it worked fine until recently. I wont get into whats wrong but am more interested in thinking about next season. My wood is free and high grade, well seasoned hardwood, in a 10 cord shed. this forum taught me everything about firewood and I do it pretty well.
option 1 is the simplest/cheapest, replace with same unit, if, and I mean IF I can get 10-15yrs or so out of a new econoburn 150 unit then that might be enough for me. (not doing this forever) I have a few big problems with that first option but I'd still consider it if the next option(s) are not feasible.
option 2 garn jr, always appealed to me because of integrated storage, except for the high temp water that I (think?) I need for my house. I'm home alot during the winter and can babysit a boiler if needed. Not that I want to but if it means I have greater long term durability/reliability then I'm still interested. With the batch burns it sounds like I'd need to start more fires to keep storage temp high, is that correct? I'm trying imagine what that would mean? new fires from scratch every 4 hrs? 8hrs? I'm also not clear if my existing pex (uponor ecoflex) is the proper size. I think mine is 1 inch, 1 supply, 1 return, and cannot be replaced (runs under a pool) so thats a deal breaker. Its also unpressurized, might need a HX?, and I'd need to build a shed for it but thats doable. Lastly I am not changing out any baseboards for low temp emitters, that's also deal breaker. So is garn jr realistic?
option 3 another outdoor gasser, years ago I considered portage main but I believe they are unpressurized, which I think means glycol and a HX? Maybe not a deal breaker because I could probably just use my existing foot print and add the HX somewhere inside...is that correct? Or maybe other brands? I use a competent hvac guy for the work, which is expensive around here, and try and diy when I can, but will never reach the engineer level that many on this forum are capable of. I am primarily interested in the return on investment, and enjoy the process of harvesting my own wood.
except for the garn I don't think I'm interested in cobbling together storage for any other gasser, I know its more efficient but if it faces the same hot water emitter issue as the garn then it seems moot...is that correct?
Thank you
signed
dumb homeowner