best choice for fuel

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

namz111

Member
Hearth Supporter
Apr 25, 2008
108
NE PA
Heres the deal I can get
1. Allegheny wood pellets
2.New england wood pellets
3.Greene team wood pellets
4.Freedom fuel wood pellets

all are the same price but not sure what I should go with, I have looked here for info on all of them and it really seems to be hit and miss so I am not sure what to get, I will be burning them in my Harman advance if that helps any.

thanks
 
I agree with Czarcar....buy a few bags of each and burn them. Then buy the ones you think work the best. Right now, I am just finishing up my 3rd ton of NEWP, and have had great results....that would be my choice if I were you.
 
Yep, Best to try a few brands. The guys here will get you close. But every stove is a little different.

I too have used the Newp's with good results.

Sorry about the other 3, I've never seen them around here!

jay
 
Buy one bag of each and try them...
 
green teams are great hardwood, i like to mix them with softwoods and get great heat
 
I had not so good results with NEWP but it was because my stove was dirty. I will give them another try next year. As for green team they were good with little ash and good heat.
 
I would not recommend freedom fuel. I have not tried the other 3. They seem to leave a lot more ash and dirty the stove window quicker. They also do not seem to burn as hot. I had about 10 bags I picked in the fall. After tring a couple of bags I only burn these mixed with another brand on warm days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.