If a split is 18 inches it would equal 1.5? So 1.5*4.5*10=67.5?
It's say half a cord but doesn't look like it.... Eyes must be going bad
It's say half a cord but doesn't look like it.... Eyes must be going bad
Cascade Failure said:Are we talking cords, face cords, chords or dictionary cords?
Actually, you and Sav both have your math right.
iceman said:If a split is 18 inches it would equal 1.5? So 1.5*4.5*10=67.5?
It's say half a cord but doesn't look like it.... Eyes must be going bad
CTYank said:iceman said:If a split is 18 inches it would equal 1.5? So 1.5*4.5*10=67.5?
It's say half a cord but doesn't look like it.... Eyes must be going bad
In intro-level chemistry and physics, you'd learn that the above is meaningless- no units specified, just numbers. So, it's true, but meaningless.
iceman said:I have been using the formula for years but stacking tight 5*10*12 area does always work to almost 5 cords ... I found to be more accurate needed to measure by rows not by space. Looking at my row it it just didn't look like half a cord but the numbers don't lie...
However I think my locust drop is more than 2 cords gonna say 2.5-3!
WTF...that's Wood Total Footage? :lol:CTYank said:as opposed to the original wtf.
shawneyboy said:CTYank said:iceman said:If a split is 18 inches it would equal 1.5? So 1.5*4.5*10=67.5?
It's say half a cord but doesn't look like it.... Eyes must be going bad
In intro-level chemistry and physics, you'd learn that the above is meaningless- no units specified, just numbers. So, it's true, but meaningless.
Smart Ass !
Backwoods Savage said:Yup. Assuming that your 10 means 10 feet. It is actually .527% of a cord.
fossil said:Backwoods Savage said:Yup. Assuming that your 10 means 10 feet. It is actually .527% of a cord.
Dennis, you need to either drop that % sign or move your decimal point two places to the right. Rick
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.