- Dec 14, 2005
- 177
Just a bit of a rant, but after owing an accentra for three years now and with all the problems I have had so far, and based on the numerous posts on this forum about all sorts of Harman problems, if someone asked if I would recommend purchasing an Harman I would say without hesitation with resounding "NO!".
When I decided to buy a pellet stove I went with Harman because all over the place it said they were top quality and the best brand period.
I paid top dollar for a stove that has seen 7 ignitors in over three years. I am afraid to use the automatic ignition mode which is one of the selling features of the stove because the ignitor might die prematurely.
I am reading about feeder problems, blower problems, auger problems, What kind of engineers researched these stoves?
Ignitors that dont last long, requires constant scrapping of the burn pot because of buildup. auger cracking, small ash pan that doesnt cover the whole stove making having ash all over the place, gumminess of the feed plate, etc etc etc.
Definitely Harman does not deserve to be classified as top of the line.
I am disappointed.
When I decided to buy a pellet stove I went with Harman because all over the place it said they were top quality and the best brand period.
I paid top dollar for a stove that has seen 7 ignitors in over three years. I am afraid to use the automatic ignition mode which is one of the selling features of the stove because the ignitor might die prematurely.
I am reading about feeder problems, blower problems, auger problems, What kind of engineers researched these stoves?
Ignitors that dont last long, requires constant scrapping of the burn pot because of buildup. auger cracking, small ash pan that doesnt cover the whole stove making having ash all over the place, gumminess of the feed plate, etc etc etc.
Definitely Harman does not deserve to be classified as top of the line.
I am disappointed.